But this criterion assesses how well you can step back and look at the forest. Criterion 6: Research presentation If the other criteria assess the substance of your thesis, this last one assesses its style.
But this criterion assesses how well you can step back and look at the forest. Criterion 6: Research presentation If the other criteria assess the substance of your thesis, this last one assesses its style.To score well here, your writing should be articulate and clear; your thesis should be structured in a logical way; and your referencing, formatting, spelling, and grammar should be consistent and correct.This is a guide to the criteria used by staff in assigning a mark to a piece of work.Tags: Essays About LightsPower And Greed EssaysAccounting Personal Statement OpeningEssay On Mariachi MusicSignificance Of Turner ThesisCensorship Wrong Research PaperHow To Solve Tension Problems
A mark in this range indicates proficiency, coherent and defensible arguments and adequate examples from primary sources but a rather mechanical performance.
Even if you don’t get the research results that you expected or hoped for, you can still score well on this criterion by writing about your process and outcomes in a way that demonstrates your understanding, insight, and originality.
Criterion 5: Research significance You’ll notice several repeating keywords in this criterion: ‘significance,’ ‘limitations,’ ‘implications,’ ‘recommendations,’ ‘reflection,’ and ‘evaluation.’ When you perform your research, you have to look at the trees; the detail. How do your results change things for future researchers?
(Check back later for the doctoral criteria.) The Masters / Honours assessment criteria are published on p.134-137 in the 2018 AUT Postgraduate Handbook. ) There are six criteria against which AUT Masters and Honours theses and dissertations are assessed (plus one extra consideration for Pathway 3 theses).
If you’re reading this in the future, then I’d recommend you check the criteria online because the digital copy of the handbook is always kept up-to-date with any changes. The criteria generally follow the process of completing a research project: from posing research questions (criterion 1) through to communicating findings (criterion 6). You can also get a or – grade if you exceed, or don’t quite meet, the criteria for a particular grade. First of all, if you’re submitting your thesis/dissertation under Pathway 3 (practice-led), then the standard assessment criteria are supplemented with this one to ensure that they are interpreted within a practice context: Regardless of which Pathway you choose, you will be assessed according to the following 6 criteria.