Shooting An Elephant Thesis Imperialism

Through this sentence, he shows his emotions and the respect he has for the Burmese.

Tags: Research Papers On Human TraffickingKinds And Elements Of EssayMethodology Sample DissertationChinese Character Writing PaperDuke Fuqua EssaysHarassment EssayDoll House Paper ResearchCreative Writing MeansBrief EssayPersuasive Essay Topics For College Students

Or-Nell does a great job conveying the message and feelings that he is trying to get across to the reader.

He often calls Burmese the Natives”: “Here was l, the white man with his gun, standing in front of the unarmed native crowd” 412).

They did not care about the elephant, but with the officer's help they will get the meat.

The Burmese people expects the British officer to do what they want but not what he wanted to do, “I had no intention of shooting the elephant-I had merely sent for the rifle to defend myself if necessary...” (3).

Now the British Officer is being controlled by the Burmese people, “He becomes a sort of hollow, posing dummy, the conventionalized figure of a sahib” (4).

Imperialism hurts both the parent country and the country that is being controlled.

In George Orwell's “Shooting an Elephant,” deals with the evil side of imperialism.

The shooting of the elephant in Orwell's story is the central focus from which Orwell builds his argument through the two dominant characters, the elephant and the British officer.

The dying of the elephant shows, even if a foreign country tries to do whatever it can to change a country, the country will do whatever to resist the change.

In the essay, Shooting an Elephant, George Orwell writes about his experiences as a British police officer in Burma, and compares it to the nature of imperialism.


Comments Shooting An Elephant Thesis Imperialism

The Latest from ©