Tags: Formal Ways To Conclude An EssayDoing Homework QuotesSample Literature ReviewsBusiness Plan On Coffee ShopMaking Citations In A Research PaperGood Way To Start A Research PaperPersonal Story EssayTitle Company Business PlanSolved Problems On Stress And StrainDefinition Of Creative Writing
There was no information, however, regarding the validity of the RLSS.
This paper would have been even better if the student had added a sentence or two about the results of the study.
That way, after reading the first paragraph, the reader would know the purpose, hypotheses, and findings.
There were significant differences between the three levels.
When breaking down the six behaviors and examining them individually, an ANOVA was used to analyze the data.
The analysis showed there were no significant differences between male and female coaches in overall leadership behaviors.
When the six leadership styles were examined separately, there was a significant difference in social support between males and females.High school coaches scored much higher than college level coaches in democratic behavior.Junior high coaches were significantly lower in training and instruction than either high school or college coaches.Here is a really good example of a scholary research critique written by a student in EDRS 6301.The student who submitted this paper last semester earned a 100 on his critique. A succint summary is provided in the first paragraph.In general, females scored much higher than did the male coaches.A MANOVA was also used to examine the data for differences between the three levels of coaching (junior high, high school, and college) with regard to leadership behavior in general.With regard to coaching level, 25 (0.15) were junior high coaches, 99 (0.61) high school, and 38 (0.24) at the college level.While this is a good sample size, the problem lies with the distribution of the sample.The instrument utilized was the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale (RLSS) developed by Zhang, Jensen, and Mann in 1996.This scale is used to measure six leadership behaviors: training and instruction, democratic, autocratic, social support, positive feedback, and situational consideration.